I remember that in AP Psychology
class last year, we talked about the train dilemma. Basically, a train,
carrying 200 people, is headed towards a cliff, but you are in control of the
lever that would switch the train to a different, safe track. However, this
second track is NOT safe to the 6 people tied to it who will get run over by
the train if you pull the lever. The general consensus is that we should choose
to pull the lever, thus directly killing 6 people ourselves, but allowing 200
others to live by preventing the train wreck.
In other
words, when a large number of innocent lives hang in the balance, we have an
obligation to kill a few people. But war is hardly stable. No one can tell what
other effects going to war will have; killing one Archduke for the sake of
freedom and nationalism once caused a global war that took the lives of
millions. So, while war can save lives in some cases, the difficulty of
determining when those cases are should dissuade us from war except as a last
resort.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.