Television entertains the masses
and academia educates them. Both are important in any society, and each holds
an award ceremony to celebrate their successes. The difference between their
popularities results from their different purposes. Because people rarely
follow the physicists, authors, economists and others, the Nobel Prize doesn’t
receive the same level of attention as the TV shows that play in everyone’s
home. The Nobel Laureates motivation is not entertainment, so naturally, people
aren’t entertained.
The Nobel Prizes and their winners
resonate less with the average person than the winner of the best TV show.
People watch TV, but they don’t follow scholars. TV is designed to entertain
and entice its audience, while scholars try to advance society and human
knowledge. Although these scholars affect people’s lives more, people prefer to
spend their time watching TV. Audiences’
fixation on the Emmy’s and not the Nobel Prize should not disappoint anyone
about the present state of our society. The prestigious nature of the Nobel
Prize remains unaffected by its small audience because its purpose is not to
entertain and attract. The moment the Nobel Prizes start catering to viewership
is the moment we need to worry, for they should continue to award accomplished
individuals and not be concerned with celebrity.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.